The COSMIC FP (function point) software quality metric, is no longer 'proposed' but an actual system in use and internationally recognised, whereas MarkII, like other older systems, is not recognised anywhere, and, even in the UK is in decline if not actually dormant, so this debate is already over.
Historically, from my limited understanding of the situation, it seems that originally there were upwards of 35 variants of function point style metrics until the ISO developed criteria for a acceptable solution, ISO 14143: Parts 1 to 5 (1995-2002):
The COSMIC group reviewed existing functional size measurement methods, namely the work done in the late 80's by Charles Symons in the UK. The aim was to improve on Albrecht's size index (IFPUG FPA)
As stated in many sources, the most important feature of the COSMIC method is that, unlike Mark II, it was developed alongside the emergence of the newer software applications that did not exist when Mark II was devised, thus being compatible with modern software engineering concepts and unlike the previous metrics, this method was designed to be compatible with the ideas from structured analysis and design.
Because of these two features, COSMIC has Full ISO recognition and is has inherent flexibility for a wider range of software, this flexibility also makes the metric less sensitive to mistakes during analysis than is typically the case with the Mark II metric which does not have the same ability to capture size from multiple viewpoints
Function point style metrics estimation algorithms involve applying a set of rules and procedures to a given piece of software as it is perceived from the perspective of its Functional User Requirements. As size measures are not very precise, this gives a veneer of science to what is in effect a guessing game.
The result being that while Mark II can be used for sizing of the GUI and real-time systems which did not exist when it was created only after extensive adaptation, but which itself creates difficulties of interpretation due to conflicting procedures and rules.
An important issue with the Mark II method is that the "functional components of the method are difficult or subjective to interpret" 6, different measurers will get different results.
The COSMIC method of sizing the functional requirements of software has been approved as an International Standard (ISO/IEC 19761:2003). and unlike the previous variations, COSMIC is the first method to be designed by an international team, as opposed to being the product of one academic or entity. This is a positive because it will help standardisation which will in turn improve repeatability of the measurement.
The most important disadvantage to Function point methodology is that "it takes several days to learn function point counting and more time to become proficient. This hurdle has limited the pool of trained counters." 3 Many of the sources I looked at included warnings such the following "Function Point Analysis should be performed by trained and experienced personnel. If Function Point Analysis is conducted by untrained personnel, it is reasonable to assume the analysis will done incorrectly." 4
Function point methodologies are designed around the application of complex rules and procedures that result in a numerical "value of a quantity"2 representing the functional size of the software.
Unlike the Mark II method, COSMIC requires an extra step to identify layers' before indentifying the system boundary, however this process enables the analysis to better account for the inner workings of a complex system and reduces the probability of missing functions.
The general consensus from the materials that I have read is that fundamentally the measurement effort for COSMIC is similar to that needed for established sizing methods. However unlike the other methods, COSMIC functional size method is 'easy' or 'reasonably easy' to apply.
This is in part due to the removal of the technical adjustment factors from the specifications and simplification of the transactional functions rules and terminology. Fore example, using Mark II "a function is not a point unless specific rules are satisfied"3. Where as COSMIC counting rules consist of "three core rules that establish which observations constitute a point"3.
An important factor in general ease of use is the underlying mathematical framework for quantifying and summarizing function points but which involves a loss in information when summarized into unadjusted function points.
Using COSMIC there is no separate counting of files (ILF and EIF) and is Ratio/Absolute. We would identify for each functional process, the subprocesses (entry, exit, read, write); The measurement Viewpoint allows "all functions to be included in the size measure" unlike in Mark II method, then apply measurement function as follows; FP Size = Sum(number of Entries ) + Sum(number of Exits) + Sum(number of Reads) + Sum(number of Writes)
"The size of a functional process is the sum of its data movements (entry, exit, read, write) and the size of a piece of software is the sum of the sizes of all of its functional processes." 6.
Due to the concept of data movements as opposed to Logical Files once per system used in the Mark II, COSMIC results in amore accurate size measure for the complexity of processing stored data.
For example, in the given case above it is not unreasonable to expect the update inventory transaction input to the Inventory item entity to be output during the transaction and become part of the input the inventory_item entity this is information is lost.
Under Mark II rules, it is counted as an input once when the data crossed the application boundary, but not as an input in the Invontary_item entity because the data does not leave the application boundary again at that point.
For the update inventory transaction under Mark II we can a UFPI count of (0.58*9) + (1.66 * 4) (0.26*1) = 12.12, under CosMIC we would arrive at an equivalent count of 3+5+4 =12
In conclusion, the fact that function points are not (yet) a perfect measure of an application, COSMIC does represents an advance over the IFPUG and other '1st Generation' FSM Methods. Measurement of functional sizes can be more plausible, easier to make and repeatable.
However functional size measurement technology must keep evolving to meet market needs. indeed I would think that this is too subjective to be counted as a "measure". For instance, I personally know over 120 software developers at 20 different companies, and nobody had ever heard of Function Points before I did.
The addition in COSMIC of the concept of internal layers, for better identification of component to component interaction allows for more complete analysis, and is missing from MarkII. What is still needed is a defined standard for adequate precision and an effective way to describe the accuracy of the function points which could be achieved in fact through better guidelines. Due to the fact that COSMIC is free and accessible anywhere in the world it is more likely to survive and evolve, unlike MarkII which is UK only, and proprietary.
Bibliography
[1] Abran, Alain, Robillard, Pierre N., "Function Points : A Study of their Measurement Processes and Scale Transformations", Journal of Systems and Software, May 1994, pp.171-184.
[2] Steve Neuendorf. (2001) Let Size A = X Function Points, Online, http://www.serv.net/~steve/Let%20Size%20equal%20FP.htm, October 22 2004.
[3] Steve Neuendorf. (2001) Evolving Function Points, Online, http://www.stsc.hill.af.mil/crosstalk/2001/02/fischman.html, October 25 2004.
[4] Symons, C.R., 'Function Point Analysis: Difficulties and Improvements', IEEE Trans Software Eng., vol 14, no. 1, Jan 1988
[5] Total Metrics. (2001) Function Points FAQs, Online, http://www.totalmetrics.com/cms/servlet/main?Subject=Content&ID=165, October 22 2004.
[6] Unkown. (2002) Advantages of the COSMIC-FFP method, Online, http://www.cosmicon.com/advantagecs.asp, October 25 2004.
I am the website administrator of the Wandle industrial museum (http://www.wandle.org). Established in 1983 by local people determined to ensure that the history of the valley was no longer neglected but enhanced awareness its heritage for the use and benefits of the community.
custom home cleaning Lincolnshire ..Every organization which creates collaborative documents, whether they are budgets,... Read More
What is RAID RECOVERY?RAID stands for Redundant Array of Inexpensive... Read More
What is Groupware?Have you ever had to manage document collaboration... Read More
This article is the fourth of a series of articles... Read More
After almost two decades of existence, Quark has become the... Read More
Several years ago Microsoft purchased Great Plains Software, then Navision... Read More
Microsoft Great Plains is main accounting / ERP application... Read More
Microsoft Business Solutions Great Plains is marketed for mid-size companies... Read More
Microsoft Great Plains, former Great Plains Software Dynamics, eEnterprise has... Read More
The US House of Representatives has recently passed the "Spy... Read More
Spyware is software or hardware installed on a computer without... Read More
It is possible that if one avoided all sources of... Read More
Microsoft Business Solutions Great Plains, former Great Plains Software Dynamics/eEnterprise... Read More
Microsoft Business Solutions Great Plains, Solomon, Navision, Axapta, Microsoft CRM... Read More
Looks like Microsoft Great Plains becomes more and more popular,... Read More
And kill the best layout software in the process of... Read More
Corporate ERP/MRP selection might be tough one, especially considering very... Read More
In 2004 Oracle, Inc. made its new step toward J2EE... Read More
In this small article we will show you the possible... Read More
Have you ever noticed that when you look at your... Read More
Stealing company information used to be the specialty of spies... Read More
IBM Lotus Notes with Domino email server is traditional document... Read More
Microsoft Business Solutions main middle market ERP application - Microsoft... Read More
Costs of fleet maintenance software can vary widely. It is... Read More
Microsoft Business Solutions Great Plains was historically designed to serve... Read More
move in cleaning service Glencoe ..Microsoft Business Solutions Great Plains, former Great Plains Software Dynamics... Read More
Here is some free software tools to help you build... Read More
MS CRM is very close to document workflow automation, including... Read More
ERP Consulting industry is on the way to serve clients... Read More
Some introduction into Great Plains Software products, now Microsoft Business... Read More
Sales are all about leverage, because there is only so... Read More
As seeing large number of implementations ? in our case... Read More
Great Plains Accounting, accounting package for mid-size and small companies... Read More
In the new era of internet marketing the problem of... Read More
What is a Web Database?A web database is a database... Read More
Best Software Act! is very popular CRM for small and... Read More
When Great Plains Software introduced the first graphical accounting application... Read More
Microsoft CRM is new player on the CRM software... Read More
Great Plains Purchase Order Processing (POP) module makes up one-third... Read More
There are so many different programs that clutter up your... Read More
Adobe Photoshop is one of the world's leading graphics editing... Read More
Just stress testing one of the latest Linux distributions. Been... Read More
Three highly respected names in Human Resources have joined forces... Read More
Does Microsoft Have any Real Competition? Copyright (c) 2003 Gregory... Read More
Music downloads are off the charts! We're listening to digital... Read More
MicroWorld Technologies, Inc. the leading solutions provider in the area... Read More
Microsoft Great Plains ? ERM from Microsoft Business Solutions and... Read More
No matter how much you enjoy your favorite screensavers, sometimes... Read More
We all take the computer for granted. I mean, all... Read More
In order to implement VLANs in a network environment, you'll... Read More
Software |