Considering whether or not your software company should hire a dedicated team of testers? Here are the Top 5 Wrong Reasons why you shouldn't.
We Have a Beta Program
Some people feel that the best way to debug a system is to ship it to your customers and wait for trouble tickets. I don't know how things work in your industry, but as far as I'm concerned, finding new customers is hard enough. I definitely don't want to make matters worse by shipping them buggy software.
I've spent the last 5 years in the telecommunications industry where the standard for reliability is 5-9. If I even suggested to my customers that my software was in its Beta phase, they'd hang up on me immediately. I'm positive the same is true in any industry.
Imagine if I published articles that were not only full of grammatical errors but also missed a complete sentence here and there. Would you bother sending me an email to inform me that my articles are defective? Would you recommend my newsletter to your peers? I didn't think so! So imagine how your customers feel when mission critical software breaks and crashes on them.
Developers Will Get Lazy
Some managers feel that developers will get lazy if they know someone else is responsible for testing their code. Developers are either lazy or they're not. Someone who takes pride in his work will rigorously test his code regardless of whether or not you have a dedicated team of testers.
If your developers are lazy, don't blame your testers. Blame the developers! Not hiring a team of dedicated testers won't improve the situation. It'll actually make the problem worse because your sloppy developer's code will find itself in your customer's hand instead of your testers' lab.
We Can't Afford Testers
If you can afford testing, then you can afford testers. Basic economics ? and common sense ? prove that it's more economical and efficient to hire specialists than generalists, as long as you can keep the specialists busy.
If it takes you 50 person-months to develop software, you will (statistically speaking) spend 25 person-months testing and validating it. Which do you think is more economical? Assigning 25 person-months of testing to developers or testers?
As explained in quality is job #1, one of my previous articles which lists reasons why software companies should hire a dedicated team of testers, professional QA people are more efficient at verifying software than developers are. It's their job! Keep the 1:3 ratio in mind and hire 1 tester for every 3 developers, even if it means getting rid of your bottom-of-the-barrel developers to maintain a balanced human capital budget.
Testers Find Too Many Bugs
This excuse sounds more absurd than it actually is. I agree that in some cases testers report bugs that are valueless. Enter non-ASCII characters in one field, ASCII in another, stick a screwdriver in your CD-R drive, do the hokey pokey and hit the Enter key, and the system will return an error. Who cares? No customer will ever come across this scenario in a live deployment. (Actually, if I showed you some of the defects our customers are entering in our trouble ticketing system, you'd be surprised!!!)
If you think your testers are really finding too many insignificant bugs, give them guidance. Don't ridicule their effort or disregard their problem reports. Explain the use cases you're trying to satisfy and the known (and acceptable) limitations of the system.
We Can't Find/Keep Any Good Testers
I truly sympathize with those who bring up this point because it's true. Good testers are really hard to find and the first-class ones often apply to transfer to your product development team. Still, this is not a reason to give up on hiring a dedicated team of testers.
Here are 3 suggestions to keep your testers on your QA team for as long as possible:
Luc Richard holds an MBA with a major in high technology. For the past 10 years, he's been managing the development of software applications. He is the founder of The Project Mangler (quality is job #1), an online resource that publishes free articles, stories, and other ready-to-use tools to help developers, team leaders and managers deliver software projects on time, according to specs, and within budget.
Mokena prom limo .. Lockport Chicago limo O’HareWith the advent of 'Service Pack 2' for Windows XP... Read More
Microsoft Great Plains may be recommended for international freight forwarding... Read More
Writing software manuals is boring, isn't it? We often think:... Read More
Costs of fleet maintenance software can vary widely. It is... Read More
According to a survey conducted by InfoTrends/CAP Ventures entitled "Content-Centric... Read More
This article is the third of a series of articles... Read More
If you are in the market for new staffing software,... Read More
Whether you have used Microsoft Word for years, have just... Read More
Fundraising software lets you connect with donors in a way... Read More
Today's business world is fast-paced. No matter what it is... Read More
Microsoft CRM is CRM answer from Microsoft Business Solutions. If... Read More
We would like to give you pluses and minuses of... Read More
What is a Web Database?A web database is a database... Read More
Does Microsoft care for WebmastersIt's always been a problem with... Read More
Does Microsoft Have any Real Competition? Copyright (c) 2003 Gregory... Read More
Have you ever noticed that when you look at your... Read More
While I was preparing some personal background information for a... Read More
It???s easy to understand why you might be drawn to... Read More
Lotus Notes Domino is very efficient in electronic document workflow... Read More
For those who are unclear on the differences between the... Read More
ERP is the acronym of Enterprise Resource Planning. Multi-module ERP... Read More
Follow the steps below to quickly design, generate, and deploy... Read More
Your computer cost you from hundreds to thousands of dollars,... Read More
When you think... Read More
Microsoft Great Plains ? ERM from Microsoft Business Solutions and... Read More
Mokena Chicago limo O'Hare ..Siebel is traditional CRM market leader, however and mostly due... Read More
Learning how to program software seems like a daunting task... Read More
Spyware, what it is and what it does. Basically, spyware... Read More
Pirated software is on the increase and now accounts for... Read More
Microsoft Business Solutions Great Plains is very generic accounting application... Read More
Microsoft Business Solutions offers several ERP applications: Great Plains, Navision,... Read More
Microsoft Business Solutions ? Great Plains is designed to meet... Read More
Microsoft Business Solutions main middle market ERP application - Microsoft... Read More
Microsoft Business Solutions Small Business Manager is scaled down Great... Read More
In today's business world it's all but impossible to escape... Read More
Microsoft Great Plains, designed back in 1990th as database transferable... Read More
Microsoft Business Solutions Great Plains is very popular ERP platform... Read More
Microsoft Business Solutions Great Plains fits to majority of horizontal... Read More
Microsoft Great Plains serves the wide spectrum of horizontal markets.... Read More
Microsoft Business Solutions Great Plains has several options to enable... Read More
The purpose of one of our projects was MS Exchange... Read More
XML Server can be a Web Server that stores the... Read More
With so many Microsoft Windows related viruses, errors, and other... Read More
Now is the time to look at an alternative to... Read More
This article will not attempt to advocate the use of... Read More
All your software is stored on a hard-drive. But how... Read More
The stakes are high when considering security, privacy, and savings,... Read More
Microsoft Business Solutions Great Plains, former Great Plains Software Dynamics... Read More
(1) Avoid using the same variable again and again for... Read More
Icons are used everywhere; right from software applications, to internet... Read More
Software |