Considering whether or not your software company should hire a dedicated team of testers? Here are the Top 5 Wrong Reasons why you shouldn't.
We Have a Beta Program
Some people feel that the best way to debug a system is to ship it to your customers and wait for trouble tickets. I don't know how things work in your industry, but as far as I'm concerned, finding new customers is hard enough. I definitely don't want to make matters worse by shipping them buggy software.
I've spent the last 5 years in the telecommunications industry where the standard for reliability is 5-9. If I even suggested to my customers that my software was in its Beta phase, they'd hang up on me immediately. I'm positive the same is true in any industry.
Imagine if I published articles that were not only full of grammatical errors but also missed a complete sentence here and there. Would you bother sending me an email to inform me that my articles are defective? Would you recommend my newsletter to your peers? I didn't think so! So imagine how your customers feel when mission critical software breaks and crashes on them.
Developers Will Get Lazy
Some managers feel that developers will get lazy if they know someone else is responsible for testing their code. Developers are either lazy or they're not. Someone who takes pride in his work will rigorously test his code regardless of whether or not you have a dedicated team of testers.
If your developers are lazy, don't blame your testers. Blame the developers! Not hiring a team of dedicated testers won't improve the situation. It'll actually make the problem worse because your sloppy developer's code will find itself in your customer's hand instead of your testers' lab.
We Can't Afford Testers
If you can afford testing, then you can afford testers. Basic economics ? and common sense ? prove that it's more economical and efficient to hire specialists than generalists, as long as you can keep the specialists busy.
If it takes you 50 person-months to develop software, you will (statistically speaking) spend 25 person-months testing and validating it. Which do you think is more economical? Assigning 25 person-months of testing to developers or testers?
As explained in quality is job #1, one of my previous articles which lists reasons why software companies should hire a dedicated team of testers, professional QA people are more efficient at verifying software than developers are. It's their job! Keep the 1:3 ratio in mind and hire 1 tester for every 3 developers, even if it means getting rid of your bottom-of-the-barrel developers to maintain a balanced human capital budget.
Testers Find Too Many Bugs
This excuse sounds more absurd than it actually is. I agree that in some cases testers report bugs that are valueless. Enter non-ASCII characters in one field, ASCII in another, stick a screwdriver in your CD-R drive, do the hokey pokey and hit the Enter key, and the system will return an error. Who cares? No customer will ever come across this scenario in a live deployment. (Actually, if I showed you some of the defects our customers are entering in our trouble ticketing system, you'd be surprised!!!)
If you think your testers are really finding too many insignificant bugs, give them guidance. Don't ridicule their effort or disregard their problem reports. Explain the use cases you're trying to satisfy and the known (and acceptable) limitations of the system.
We Can't Find/Keep Any Good Testers
I truly sympathize with those who bring up this point because it's true. Good testers are really hard to find and the first-class ones often apply to transfer to your product development team. Still, this is not a reason to give up on hiring a dedicated team of testers.
Here are 3 suggestions to keep your testers on your QA team for as long as possible:
Luc Richard holds an MBA with a major in high technology. For the past 10 years, he's been managing the development of software applications. He is the founder of The Project Mangler (quality is job #1), an online resource that publishes free articles, stories, and other ready-to-use tools to help developers, team leaders and managers deliver software projects on time, according to specs, and within budget.
limousine Ackley .. Lockport Chicago limo O’HareThis article will not attempt to advocate the use of... Read More
Adobe Photoshop is one of the world's leading graphics editing... Read More
Microsoft SQL Server is the leader for inexpensive and middle... Read More
Software Engineering is the Systematic Approach for analysis design implementation... Read More
As Mozilla Firefox nears 10% market share, with well over... Read More
The various resume software offered, particularly on the internet, can... Read More
In part III of this ISDN primer, we learned that... Read More
... Read More
Microsoft-Outlook is a pretty amazing program. So much more than... Read More
Fortunately one of the most common reasons cited for the... Read More
Several years ago Microsoft purchased Great Plains Software, then Navision... Read More
Microsoft Outlook is one of the most widely used software... Read More
Former Great Plains Software Dynamics/eEnterprise and currently Microsoft Business Solutions... Read More
Microsoft Great Plains is main Microsoft Business Solutions accounting package... Read More
There are certain pluses and minuses in both cases and... Read More
Microsoft Business Solutions Navision serves both European and American megamarkets.... Read More
How to delete the user? This is the first problem... Read More
Microsoft CRM is CRM application, maintained and supported by Microsoft... Read More
Shareware is software that you can try before you buy;... Read More
If you would like to pick something from Microsoft, or... Read More
Microsoft Business Solutions Great Plains is mid and even corporate... Read More
Viruses and spyware usually show up on your computer one... Read More
New post-recession era has new features, which didn't exist in... Read More
The stakes are high when considering security, privacy, and savings,... Read More
Microsoft Business Solutions Great Plains, former Great Plains Software Dynamics... Read More
shuttle from O'Hare Alexander ..A UNIX Shell is in simplest terms, a command line... Read More
IBM Lotus Notes Domino and Microsoft CRM (Client Relation Management)... Read More
Just stress testing one of the latest Linux distributions. Been... Read More
Great Plains Software Dynamics, Dynamics C/S+, eEnterprise were written on... Read More
We'll give you non formal view, based on our consulting... Read More
Microsoft Business Solutions ? Navision is an integrated solution for... Read More
Microsoft Great Plains serves the wide spectrum of horizontal markets.... Read More
If you have Microsoft Great Plains and support it for... Read More
MSN messenger is a pretty cool invention. I mean I'm... Read More
Homeland security, airport security, Internet security ??" these days we???re... Read More
Manufacturing in the USA is far away down from mid... Read More
Looks like Microsoft Great Plains becomes more and more popular,... Read More
Microsoft Great Plains is main Microsoft Business Solutions accounting package... Read More
Microsoft Great Plains, Navision, Solomon and Axapta are Microsoft Business... Read More
You probably didn't casually invite, or extend a formal attendance... Read More
In order to meet regulatory and corporate compliance requirements reporting... Read More
There are several kinds of software piracy. The bottom line... Read More
Our opinion is based on our Microsoft Business Solutions Great... Read More
The first topic we are going to discuss... Read More
Microsoft bought Navision, Denmark based software development company, along with... Read More
In this short FAQ style article we would like to... Read More
Sticky Noteshttp://www.deprice.com/stickynote.htmWith StickyNote 9.0, you can create beautiful 3D notes... Read More
Bad News - the Threat is Bigger than it SeemedHow... Read More
Think of this, first we had the HAM Radio, then... Read More
This article is for advanced Microsoft CRM SDK C# developers.... Read More
Software |