After some forty years of banking and investments, I retired in 2001. But since I do not golf, I soon found retirement to be very boring. So I decided to return to the investment world after ten months. However, those ten months were not a complete waste of time, for I had spent them in trying to utilize my forty years of investment experience to gain perspective on the most recent stock market "bubble" and subsequent "crash."
There were several people who saw the stock market crash coming, but they had different ideas as to when it would occur. Those who were too early had to suffer the derision of their peers. It was difficult to take a stand when so many were proclaiming that we were in a "new era" of investing and that the old rules no longer applied. Since the beginning of 1998 through the market high of March 2000, among 8,000 stock recommendations by Wall Street analysts, only 29 recommended "sell."
I am on record as having called for a cautious approach to investment two years before the "Crash of 2000." In an in-house investment newsletter dated April 1998, I have a picture of the "Titanic" with the caption: "Does anyone see any icebergs?"
When I resumed employment in 2002, I happened to glance at the chart on the last page of Value Line, which showed the stock market as having topped out, by coincidence, in April 1998, the same date as my "Titanic" newsletter! The Value Line Composite Index reached a high of 508.39 on April 21, 1998 and has been lower EVER SINCE! But on the first page of the same issue, the date of the market high was given as "5-22-01"! When I contacted Value Line about this discrepancy , I was surprised to learn that they had changed their method of computing the index for "market highs" from "geometric" to "arithmetic." They said they would change the name of the Value Line "Composite" Index to the Value Line "Geometric" Index, since that is how it has been computed over the years. Currently Value Line is showing a recent market low on 10-9-02 and the most recent market high, based on this new "arithmetic" index, on 4-5-04, ANOTHER ALL-TIME HIGH! If they had stayed with the original "geometric" index, the all-time high would still be April 21, 1998!
Later that year, I was pleasantly surprised to read in "Barron's" an interview with Ned Davis, of Ned Davis Research, that said that his indicators had picked up on the bear market's beginnings in April 1998, the same date as my "Titanic" newsletter! So, my instincts were correct! I believe that we are in a "secular" downturn that began in April 1998 and the "Bubble of 2000" was a market rally in what was already a long-term bear market.
Another development transpired soon after I resumed employment in 2002. I happened to notice one day that, in its "Market Laboratory," "Barron's" had inexplicably changed the P/E Ratio of the S&P 500 to 28.57 from 40.03 the previous week! This was due to a change to "operating" earnings of $39.28 from "net" or "reported " earnings of $28.31 the previous week. I and others wrote to "Barron's Mailbag" to complain about this change and to disagree with it, since these new P/E ratios could not be compared with historical P/Es. "Barron's apparently accepted our arguments and, about two months later, changed back to using "reported" earnings instead of "operating" earnings and revised the S&P 500 data to show a P/E Ratio of 45.09 compared to a previous week's 29.64.
But a similar problem occurred the next day in a sister publication to "Barron's." On April 9, 2002, "The Wall Street Journal" came out with a new format that included, for the first time, charts and data for the Nasdaq Composite, S&P 500 Index and Russell 2000, in addition to its own three Dow Jones indices. The P/E Ratio for the S&P 500 was given as 26, instead of the 45.09 now found in "Barron's." I wrote to the WSJ and after much correspondence back and forth, they finally accepted my argument and on July 29, 2002 changed the P/E Ratio for the S&P 500 from 19 to 30! I had given them examples showing where some financial writers had inadvertently confused "apples" with "oranges" by comparing their P/E of 19, based on "operating" earnings, with the long-term average P/E of 16, based on "reported" earnings.
Because I started to be cautious about investing as early as April 1998, since I thought that price/earnings ratios for the stock market were perilously high, I was not hurt personally by the "Crash of 2000" and had tried to get my clients into less aggressive and more liquid positions in their investment portfolios. But the pressures to go along with the market were tremendous!
Price/earnings ratios do not enable us to "time the market." But comparing them to past historical performance does enable us to tell when a stock market is high and vulnerable to eventual correction, even though others around us may have lost their bearings. High P/Es alert us to a need for caution and a conservative approach in our investment decisions, such as a renewed emphasis on dividends. Very high P/Es usually indicate a long-term bear market may ensue for a very long period of time. We are apparently in such a long-term bear market now. But in determining whether the market is high, we must be vigilant with regard to what data mambers of the financial press are reporting to us, so we can compare "apples" with "apples." When the financial information does not appear to be correct, we, as financial analysts, owe it to the investment community to challenge such information. That is what I have concluded from my personal "odyssey" in the investment world.
After three years of the DJIA and the S&P 500 closing below their previous year-end figures, the market finally closed higher at the end of 2003. But the P/E ratio is still high for both indices.
Does anyone see any icebergs?
Henry V. Janoski, MBA, CFA, CSA is a 1955 graduate 'magna cum laude" of Yale University and a member of Phi Beta Kappa. He received his MBA in finance and banking from the Wharton Graduate Business School of the University of Pennsylvania in 1960 and holds the professional designations of Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) and Certified Senior Advisor (CSA). As a registered investment advisor representative with the title of Senior Investment Officer, he is located in Scranton, PA. His biography is listed in "Who's Who in Finance and Industry" and in "Who's Who in America." E-mail address: hjanoski@aol.com
Wood Dale Chicago prom limo .. Lockport Chicago limo O’HareWhen it comes to stock market trading it PAYS to... Read More
When an individual investor wants to roll up his sleeves... Read More
(1) CHK stock price $16.74, NAV $32.5CHK is my favorite... Read More
What the heck am I talking about?It is often said... Read More
When we go to the circus we see a trapeze... Read More
A PEG ratio cannot be used alone but is a... Read More
Are you one of those many people who dread reading... Read More
Every publicly traded company is required by the SEC(Securities and... Read More
If you are going to be a winner in the... Read More
I was devastated!I just couldn't believe it. I was 10... Read More
I often hear from people, "I don't trade. I invest.... Read More
There has been great condemnation recently because China has been... Read More
You'd have had to be living on a desert island... Read More
The debate rages all over Eastern and Central Europe, in... Read More
If there is one term over-used when talking about making... Read More
This is a rather simple strategy with which I am... Read More
In 1960 an engineer working for a watch company in... Read More
Ever have one of those sample boxes of candy? Each... Read More
One of the most believed bits of conventional wisdom from... Read More
Both the stock market and oil prices rallied recently, which... Read More
The recent criminal fiasco in the mutual fund industry is... Read More
Using Swing Trading Strategies and Technical Analysis when Trading Stocks... Read More
How many times has this happened to you? You're at... Read More
There is so much involved in developing peak performance, that... Read More
You read and hear a lot about hedge funds. Unfortunately,... Read More
Antigo wedding limo ..Minority Report the movie may not be far off if... Read More
The gleam and bright lights of Wall Street lure in... Read More
As GuruFocus updates the stock buys and sells of gurus,... Read More
TOO OFTEN, INVESTORS SIMPLY CHOOSE TO follow the crowd. This... Read More
Every broker and financial planner will tell you that you... Read More
Where is the beef? Or maybe it should be where... Read More
With the internet such a huge part of our daily... Read More
"Buy and hold" is one of the most heralded investment... Read More
Much like the middle child, mid-cap stocks have long struggled... Read More
It has fallen upon the consumer to make our economy... Read More
Unfortunately, most of you who are reading my column are... Read More
'Sector funds are too risky.' 'I doubled my money with... Read More
In my opinion, due to the volatility of stock market... Read More
When it comes to mutual funds, there is a lot... Read More
"If you don't know where you are going, any road... Read More
Investing in long-term financial vehicles give you the most gains... Read More
If you go to Haiti or other places in the... Read More
What account size do I need?How much money can I... Read More
According to Investopedia Inc. the penny stock market has seen... Read More
I made my very first investment in the stock market... Read More
Financial markets provide their participants with the most favorable conditions... Read More
Analyzing growth stocks is an important focus for any investor.... Read More
A few years back ? it seems like an eternity... Read More
Every day I see in the financial section of newspapers... Read More
THERE'S SOMETHING TO BE SAID FOR standing firm in the... Read More
Stocks & Mutual Fund |