After some forty years of banking and investments, I retired in 2001. But since I do not golf, I soon found retirement to be very boring. So I decided to return to the investment world after ten months. However, those ten months were not a complete waste of time, for I had spent them in trying to utilize my forty years of investment experience to gain perspective on the most recent stock market "bubble" and subsequent "crash."
There were several people who saw the stock market crash coming, but they had different ideas as to when it would occur. Those who were too early had to suffer the derision of their peers. It was difficult to take a stand when so many were proclaiming that we were in a "new era" of investing and that the old rules no longer applied. Since the beginning of 1998 through the market high of March 2000, among 8,000 stock recommendations by Wall Street analysts, only 29 recommended "sell."
I am on record as having called for a cautious approach to investment two years before the "Crash of 2000." In an in-house investment newsletter dated April 1998, I have a picture of the "Titanic" with the caption: "Does anyone see any icebergs?"
When I resumed employment in 2002, I happened to glance at the chart on the last page of Value Line, which showed the stock market as having topped out, by coincidence, in April 1998, the same date as my "Titanic" newsletter! The Value Line Composite Index reached a high of 508.39 on April 21, 1998 and has been lower EVER SINCE! But on the first page of the same issue, the date of the market high was given as "5-22-01"! When I contacted Value Line about this discrepancy , I was surprised to learn that they had changed their method of computing the index for "market highs" from "geometric" to "arithmetic." They said they would change the name of the Value Line "Composite" Index to the Value Line "Geometric" Index, since that is how it has been computed over the years. Currently Value Line is showing a recent market low on 10-9-02 and the most recent market high, based on this new "arithmetic" index, on 4-5-04, ANOTHER ALL-TIME HIGH! If they had stayed with the original "geometric" index, the all-time high would still be April 21, 1998!
Later that year, I was pleasantly surprised to read in "Barron's" an interview with Ned Davis, of Ned Davis Research, that said that his indicators had picked up on the bear market's beginnings in April 1998, the same date as my "Titanic" newsletter! So, my instincts were correct! I believe that we are in a "secular" downturn that began in April 1998 and the "Bubble of 2000" was a market rally in what was already a long-term bear market.
Another development transpired soon after I resumed employment in 2002. I happened to notice one day that, in its "Market Laboratory," "Barron's" had inexplicably changed the P/E Ratio of the S&P 500 to 28.57 from 40.03 the previous week! This was due to a change to "operating" earnings of $39.28 from "net" or "reported " earnings of $28.31 the previous week. I and others wrote to "Barron's Mailbag" to complain about this change and to disagree with it, since these new P/E ratios could not be compared with historical P/Es. "Barron's apparently accepted our arguments and, about two months later, changed back to using "reported" earnings instead of "operating" earnings and revised the S&P 500 data to show a P/E Ratio of 45.09 compared to a previous week's 29.64.
But a similar problem occurred the next day in a sister publication to "Barron's." On April 9, 2002, "The Wall Street Journal" came out with a new format that included, for the first time, charts and data for the Nasdaq Composite, S&P 500 Index and Russell 2000, in addition to its own three Dow Jones indices. The P/E Ratio for the S&P 500 was given as 26, instead of the 45.09 now found in "Barron's." I wrote to the WSJ and after much correspondence back and forth, they finally accepted my argument and on July 29, 2002 changed the P/E Ratio for the S&P 500 from 19 to 30! I had given them examples showing where some financial writers had inadvertently confused "apples" with "oranges" by comparing their P/E of 19, based on "operating" earnings, with the long-term average P/E of 16, based on "reported" earnings.
Because I started to be cautious about investing as early as April 1998, since I thought that price/earnings ratios for the stock market were perilously high, I was not hurt personally by the "Crash of 2000" and had tried to get my clients into less aggressive and more liquid positions in their investment portfolios. But the pressures to go along with the market were tremendous!
Price/earnings ratios do not enable us to "time the market." But comparing them to past historical performance does enable us to tell when a stock market is high and vulnerable to eventual correction, even though others around us may have lost their bearings. High P/Es alert us to a need for caution and a conservative approach in our investment decisions, such as a renewed emphasis on dividends. Very high P/Es usually indicate a long-term bear market may ensue for a very long period of time. We are apparently in such a long-term bear market now. But in determining whether the market is high, we must be vigilant with regard to what data mambers of the financial press are reporting to us, so we can compare "apples" with "apples." When the financial information does not appear to be correct, we, as financial analysts, owe it to the investment community to challenge such information. That is what I have concluded from my personal "odyssey" in the investment world.
After three years of the DJIA and the S&P 500 closing below their previous year-end figures, the market finally closed higher at the end of 2003. But the P/E ratio is still high for both indices.
Does anyone see any icebergs?
Henry V. Janoski, MBA, CFA, CSA is a 1955 graduate 'magna cum laude" of Yale University and a member of Phi Beta Kappa. He received his MBA in finance and banking from the Wharton Graduate Business School of the University of Pennsylvania in 1960 and holds the professional designations of Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) and Certified Senior Advisor (CSA). As a registered investment advisor representative with the title of Senior Investment Officer, he is located in Scranton, PA. His biography is listed in "Who's Who in Finance and Industry" and in "Who's Who in America." E-mail address: hjanoski@aol.com
limo prices to midway Crystal Lake west of Randal .. Lockport Chicago limo O’HareYou must take the time once a month to review... Read More
When you become interested in a stock or mutual fund... Read More
Professional stock options traders use the term lean to refer... Read More
We've all heard of the stock market and probably have... Read More
The ABC's of Stock Trading SuccessStock trading success...why is it... Read More
With the internet such a huge part of our daily... Read More
(1) Stock Market is Tough Place to Make Any Money... Read More
Checked your 401K lately? Going back to about a year... Read More
In one of my previous articles (Investing in the stock... Read More
Just 30 years ago the stock market was a shadow... Read More
For the year 2000 we have seen hundreds of mutual... Read More
Every successful trader has a winning system. There are of... Read More
All stock trading and investing methods must deal with the... Read More
I have watched my cat play with a bag of... Read More
Most advisors will tell you they can beat the market.... Read More
From the book 'The Stockopoly Plan' by the author Charles... Read More
What can I expect to make my first year of... Read More
Four blind men were asked to give a description of... Read More
Much like the middle child, mid-cap stocks have long struggled... Read More
Have you bought any mutual funds this year or late... Read More
This is a guide to the different types of mutual... Read More
Mutual funds were moderately successful in creating a presence in... Read More
You should ignore analysts on TV, the radio, the newspaper... Read More
Inverted interest rates? What's that? Who cares? Even if you... Read More
Trading is a fascinating activity.There are so many layers to... Read More
taxi o'hare Auburn ..This is the continuing story of our two imaginary traders,... Read More
Let me start by saying that...Most online brokers do not... Read More
It has fallen upon the consumer to make our economy... Read More
With an insecure job market, overworked employees, insufficient retirement savings... Read More
You have heard about a particular mutual fund from a... Read More
In one of my previous articles (Investing in the stock... Read More
If you're a normal human being, your need to feel... Read More
Outlined below are some of the advantages and disadvantages of... Read More
Do you have a financial planner? Does one of your... Read More
People are always asking me when should I sell my... Read More
It has been said that low cost or even free... Read More
Two weeks ago I wrote about what the Securities and... Read More
Where is the beef? Or maybe it should be where... Read More
One of the most believed bits of conventional wisdom from... Read More
I made my very first investment in the stock market... Read More
How many times has this happened to you? You're at... Read More
When it comes to stock market trading it PAYS to... Read More
Every day I hear from the "experts" on CNBC-TV and... Read More
During our travel down life's path we come to many... Read More
If you have talked to a stock broker or financial... Read More
During the month of January the Dow Jones Industrial Average,... Read More
Among the largest forces that affect stock prices are inflation,... Read More
You should ignore analysts on TV, the radio, the newspaper... Read More
Has your broker been calling you recently with the "great... Read More
For the last few weeks we have seen the stock... Read More
Stocks & Mutual Fund |