They are the object of thinly disguised envy. They are the raw materials of vulgar jokes and the targets of popular aggression. They are the Newly Rich. Perhaps they should be dealt with more appropriately within the academic discipline of psychology, but then economics in a branch of psychology. To many, they represent a psychopathology or a sociopathology.
The Newly Rich are not a new phenomenon. Every generation has them. They are the upstarts, those who seek to undermine the existing elite, to replace it and, ultimately to join it. Indeed, the Newly Rich can be classified in accordance with their relations with the well-entrenched Old Rich. Every society has its veteran, venerable and aristocratic social classes. In most cases, there was a strong correlation between wealth and social standing. Until the beginning of this century, only property owners could vote and thus participate in the political process. The land gentry secured military and political positions for its off spring, no matter how ill equipped they were to deal with the responsibilities thrust upon them. The privileged access and the insiders mentality ("old boys network" to use a famous British expression) made sure that economic benefits were not spread evenly. This skewed distribution, in turn, served to perpetuate the advantages of the ruling classes.
Only when wealth was detached from the land, was this solidarity broken. Land ? being a scarce, non-reproducible resource ? fostered a scarce, non-reproducible social elite. Money, on the other hand, could be multiplied, replicated, redistributed, reshuffled, made and lost. It was democratic in the truest sense of a word, otherwise worn thin. With meritocracy in the ascendance, aristocracy was in descent. People made money because they were clever, daring, fortunate, visionary ? but not because they were born to the right family or married into one. Money, the greatest of social equalizers, wedded the old elite. Blood mixed and social classes were thus blurred. The aristocracy of capital (and, later, of entrepreneurship) ? to which anyone with the right qualifications could belong ? trounced the aristocracy of blood and heritage. For some, this was a sad moment. For others, a triumphant one.
The New Rich chose one of three paths: subversion, revolution and emulation. All three modes of reaction were the results of envy, a sense of inferiority and rage at being discriminated against and humiliated.
Some New Rich chose to undermine the existing order. This was perceived by them to be an inevitable, gradual, slow and "historically sanctioned" process. The transfer of wealth (and the power associated with it) from one elite to another constituted the subversive element. The ideological shift (to meritocracy and democracy or to mass- democracy as y Gasset would have put it) served to justify the historical process and put it in context. The successes of the new elite, as a class, and of its members, individually, served to prove the "justice" behind the tectonic shift. Social institutions and mores were adapted to reflect the preferences, inclinations, values, goals and worldview of the new elite. This approach ? infinitesimal, graduated, cautious, all accommodating but also inexorable and all pervasive ? characterizes Capitalism. The Capitalist Religion, with its temples (shopping malls and banks), clergy (bankers, financiers, bureaucrats) and rituals ? was created by the New Rich. It had multiple aims: to bestow some divine or historic importance and meaning upon processes which might have otherwise been perceived as chaotic or threatening. To serve as an ideology in the Althusserian sense (hiding the discordant, the disagreeable and the ugly while accentuating the concordant, conformist and appealing). To provide a historical process framework, to prevent feelings of aimlessness and vacuity, to motivate its adherents and to perpetuate itself and so on.
The second type of New Rich (also known as "Nomenclature" in certain regions of the world) chose to violently and irreversibly uproot and then eradicate the old elite. This was usually done by use of brute force coated with a thin layer of incongruent ideology. The aim was to immediately inherit the wealth and power accumulated by generations of elitist rule. There was a declared intention of an egalitarian redistribution of wealth and assets. But reality was different: a small group ? the new elite ? scooped up most of the spoils. It amounted to a surgical replacement of one hermetic elite by another. Nothing changed, just the personal identities. A curious dichotomy has formed between the part of the ideology, which dealt with the historical process ? and the other part, which elucidated the methods to be employed to facilitate the transfer of wealth and its redistribution. While the first was deterministic, long-term and irreversible (and, therefore, not very pragmatic) ? the second was an almost undisguised recipe for pillage and looting of other people' property. Communism and the Eastern European (and, to a lesser extent, the Central European) versions of Socialism suffered from this inherent poisonous seed of deceit. So did Fascism. It is no wonder that these two sister ideologies fought it out in the first half of the twentieth century. Both prescribed the unabashed, unmitigated, unrestrained, forced transfer of wealth from one elite to another. The proletariat enjoyed almost none of the loot.
The third way was that of emulation. The Newly Rich, who chose to adopt it, tried to assimilate the worldview, the values and the behaviour patterns of their predecessors. They walked the same, talked the same, clad themselves in the same fashion, bought the same status symbols, ate the same food. In general, they looked as pale imitations of the real thing. In the process, they became more catholic than the Pope, more Old Rich than the Old Rich. They exaggerated gestures and mannerisms, they transformed refined and delicate art to kitsch, their speech became hyperbole, their social associations dictated by ridiculously rigid codes of propriety and conduct. As in similar psychological situations, patricide and matricide followed. The Newly Rich rebelled against what they perceived to be the tyranny of a dying class. They butchered their objects of emulation ? sometimes, physically. Realizing their inability to be what they always aspired to be, the Newly Rich switched from frustration and permanent humiliation to aggression, violence and abuse. These new converts turned against the founders of their newly found religion with the rage and conviction reserved to true but disappointed believers.
Regardless of the method of inheritance adopted by the New Rich, all of them share some common characteristics. Psychologists know that money is a love substitute. People accumulate it as a way to compensate themselves for past hurts and deficiencies. They attach great emotional significance to the amount and availability of their money. They regress: they play with toys (fancy cars, watches, laptops). They fight over property, territory and privileges in a Jungian archetypal manner. Perhaps this is the most important lesson of all: the New Rich are children, aspiring to become adults. Having been deprived of love and possessions in their childhood ? they turn to money and to what it can buy as a (albeit poor because never fulfilling) substitute. And as children are ? they can be cruel, insensitive, unable to delay the satisfaction of their urges and desires. In many countries (the emerging markets) they are the only capitalists to be found. There, they spun off a malignant, pathological, form of crony capitalism. As time passes, these immature New Rich will become tomorrow's Old Rich and a new class will emerge, the New Rich of the future. This is the only hope ? however inadequate and meagre ? that developing countries have.
About The Author
Sam Vaknin is the author of "Malignant Self Love - Narcissism Revisited" and "After the Rain - How the West Lost the East". He is a columnist in "Central Europe Review", United Press International (UPI) and ebookweb.org and the editor of mental health and Central East Europe categories in The Open Directory, Suite101 and searcheurope.com. Until recently, he served as the Economic Advisor to the Government of Macedonia.
His web site: http://samvak.tripod.com
limousine Ackley .. Lockport Chicago limo O’HareUncle Sam and his band of merry-men, better known as... Read More
The idle are a peculiar kind of dead that cannot... Read More
1. Pay off high-cost debt. The best investment most borrowers... Read More
Have you ever asked yourself what your highest income producing... Read More
Anyone knows that material wealth is measured in goods: apples,... Read More
SCENE 1: Pharaoh has just woken up from a very... Read More
I counsel a LOT of people about money. I see... Read More
No matter what markets you serve; what products you sell;... Read More
Look at Forbes' top 10 United States wealthiest people. Notice... Read More
No matter what income level you are currently at, generating... Read More
Would you like to profit from your own information empire?... Read More
In light of the dominant mindset overshadowing the market these... Read More
I want to share an experience I had in common... Read More
I'm constantly reading articles on the internet and in financial... Read More
Let's begin this lesson with a definition of the term... Read More
Paper burns and large companies can go bankrupt, but if... Read More
There are few things in life that are more stressful... Read More
Results from a new tool developed by UK based firm,... Read More
Most people know it's important to keep and organize all... Read More
Whenever we read about building wealth or even attend a... Read More
Key 1 Pay your self firstkey 2 Saving is not... Read More
"If you know how to spend less than you get,... Read More
"Any fool can rich, the wise get wealthy." Chris WidenerGetting... Read More
One of the things most of us have old ideas... Read More
OK, this article will start with the cheapest piece of... Read More
shuttle from O'Hare Alexander ..The word 'diversity' is a unique one. It can represent... Read More
There are many wealth creation strategies and investment techniques available... Read More
Many people assume that the offshore world is accessible only... Read More
When I look around at all of my friends, and... Read More
Have you any idea how many people search Google every... Read More
Okay. So money doesn't really grow on trees. Unless you... Read More
Are you setting the right money goals?Most people believe having... Read More
Financial planning often gets a bad rap. Part of the... Read More
Despite what you may have read or heard, anyone is... Read More
Self-Made Millionaires are not smarter or better than you. They... Read More
1. Pay off high-cost debt. The best investment most borrowers... Read More
Many people have a false understanding of what it actually... Read More
We all go to school for about twelve years, kindergarten... Read More
When Building Wealth by Russ Whitney was released a few... Read More
According to Wallace Wattles, in his popular wealth treatise called... Read More
The rewarding of high compensation packages to top executives who... Read More
In his best selling book, "Rich Dad, Poor Dad, Robert... Read More
I have a good friend who works in an area... Read More
What is "The Commodity of Kings""Power is simply "the ability... Read More
Look at Forbes' top 10 United States wealthiest people. Notice... Read More
Money is probably the most challenging thing for many people... Read More
It is sometimes pitful how many projects are never born... Read More
Masters degree not required...just a little common sense, a $5.00... Read More
Recently, one late winter night, my four-year old son and... Read More
Points to ponder as you consider what can be done... Read More
Wealth Building |